Inductive study shows contrasting outcomes of executive compensation during COVID in cruise line firms, highlighting the role of authentic leadership.
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the cruise line industry to an unprecedented crisis. Recovery required sustained discretionary effort from employees, simultaneously balancing safety concerns and extreme financial hardship. However, not all firms in the industry were affected equally. From January 2019 to January 2025, among the three dominant players in the industry, Norwegian Cruise Lines (NCLH) and Carnival Cruise Lines (CCL) saw their stock prices drop by approximately half. During the same period, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines (RCL) achieved extraordinary stock market performance, more than doubling their 2019 valuation. This inductive study explores whether generous executive pay increases awarded during the COVID-19 crisis may have diminished managers’ abilities to engage in authentic leadership (AL). Conceptual findings raise questions about whether the absence of rigorous AL may undermine employee motivation, resulting in depressed firm performance. Emergent themes primarily conform with the rent extraction and signaling views of executive compensation. Little support for the efficient contracting view is detectable. Inauthentic executive messaging and perceived executive opportunism at NCLH and CCL were associated with reduced employee motivation and poor share price performance, despite a full market rebound. In contrast, RCL’s more congruent executive actions and communications were accompanied by a stronger recovery aided by higher employee productivity. This analysis contributes to the AL literature by illustrating how compensation practices can constrain authentic communication and leadership efficacy in crisis situations. Implications for corporate governance, organizational resilience, and leadership development are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lewis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: