PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2025PLoS ONE5 citationsOpen Access

Cultural topography of publicness: Assessment of the publicness of public spaces in traditional settlements

View Full Paper
ZWZhenru WangSKSheng KangDLDatong Li

Key Points

  • Public spaces' publicness varies regionally, with riverside areas showing higher engagement and activity.
  • Validation tests demonstrated a strong reliability (R² = 0.832) between calculated publicness and expert ratings.
  • Residents' habits and urban-rural perception gaps are main factors influencing public space evaluations.
  • Recommendations include developing unique facilities and enhancing cultural exchanges to revitalize village spaces.

Abstract

In the process of rapid urbanization in China, the public spaces of traditional settlements are undergoing significant transformations and facing numerous challenges. Systematically assessing their publicness and improving spatial quality have become critical issues. This study employs the space syntax method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to assess the publicness of the public spaces in Zengchong Dong Village and Langde Miao Village, two traditional settlements in the Qiandongnan region, China. Drawing on field research and questionnaire data, we constructed an evaluation index system for publicness from both subjective and objective perspectives, encompassing five dimensions: accessibility, visibility, functionality, iconicity, and inclusiveness. The results show that: 1) The publicness of public spaces varies regionally, with riverside areas exhibiting higher publicness and more vibrant activities compared to adjacent mountainous areas; 2) Validation tests confirmed system reliability (R 2 = 0.832) between calculated publicness scores and expert rating; and 3) Residents’ living habits and the differences in urban-rural perception are the main factors affecting the evaluation of public space publicness. On this basis, our study suggests building unique facilities, involving multiple parties in governance, and boosting cultural exchanges. These steps aid in reviving traditional village spaces, backing rural tourism and spurring economic and cultural growth.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd91cffe798ba2fc498da8https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0332755
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper