This study demonstrates improved reference evapotranspiration predictions using machine learning models, indicating effective resource management.
Accurate estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is essential for efficient agricultural water management, especially in arid and semi-arid regions where climate variability limits traditional methods. This study evaluates the FAO Penman–Monteith (PM) equation and five machine learning (ML) models using a 5-year (2019–2023) dataset from two California stations: Parlier (Mediterranean) and Meloland (desert). Among 31 input combinations, CatBoost outperformed others, achieving an R2 of 0.995 and a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.161 mm/day at Parlier, and an R2 of 0.991 and an RMSE of 0.211 mm/day at Meloland. Using only mean temperature and net radiation, CatBoost maintained strong performance (R2: 0.932–0.948; RMSE: 0.507–0.589 mm/day). Bayesian optimization enhanced model tuning and reduced overfitting. Compared with random forest and XGBoost, CatBoost reduced RMSE by 5–12% and generalized well across sites. Violin boxplots confirmed its stability and accuracy. A user-friendly graphical interface was also developed for real-time ETo estimation. These results highlight the promise of ML-based ETo prediction tools for practical, scalable use in data-limited environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eltarabily et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: