PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2025Toxics3 citationsOpen Access

Heavy Metal Pollution and Health-Ecological Risk Assessment in Agricultural Soils: A Case Study from the Yellow River Bend Industrial Parks

View Full Paper
ZLZhonghua LiuLMLi MoJLJiahui Liang

Key Points

  • Heavy metal pollution levels in agricultural soils exceed local background values by factors up to 11.2.
  • The ecological risk assessment identified cadmium as the major risk factor among the heavy metals studied.
  • Geostatistical models demonstrated elevated heavy metal concentrations in specific subregions of the Yellow River bend.
  • Health risk assessments suggest that non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks for both adults and children are within acceptable limits.

Abstract

Agricultural soils near industrial parks in the Yellow River bend region face severe heavy metal pollution, posing a significant to human health. This study integrated field sampling with laboratory analysis and applied geostatistical analysis, positive matrix factorization (PMF) modeling, and health risk assessment models to systematically investigate the pollution levels, spatial distribution, sources, and ecological health risks of heavy metals in the area. The main findings are as follows: (1) The average concentrations of the eight heavy metals (Hg, Cr, Cu, Pb, Zn, As, Cd, and Ni) in the study area were 0.04, 48.3, 54.3, 45.7, 70.0, 22.9, 0.4, and 35.7 mg·kg−1, respectively. The concentrations exceeded local background values by factors ranging from 1.32 to 11.2. Exceedances of soil screening and control values were particularly pronounced for Cd and As. Based on the geoaccumulation index, over 75% of the sampling sites for Cr, Pb, Zn, and Cd were classified as moderately to heavily polluted. Potential ecological risk assessment highlighted Cd as the significant ecological risk factor, indicating considerable heavy metal pollution in the region. (2) Kriging interpolation demonstrated elevated concentrations in the western (mid-upper) and eastern (mid-lower) subregions. Pearson correlation analysis suggested common sources for Cu-Pb-As-Cd and Cr-Zn-Ni. (3) PMF source apportionment identified four primary sources: traffic emissions (38.19%), natural and agricultural mixed sources (34.55%), metal smelting (17.61%), and atmospheric deposition (10.10%). (4) Health risk assessment indicated that the non-carcinogenic risk for both adults and children was within acceptable limits (adults: 0.065; children: 0.12). Carcinogenic risks were also acceptable (adults: 5.67 × 10−5; children: 6.70 × 10−5). In conclusion, priority should be given to the control of traffic emissions and agriculturally derived sources in the management of soil heavy metal contamination in this region, while the considerable contribution of smelting activities warrants heightened attention. This study provides a scientific basis for the prevention, control, and targeted remediation of regional soil heavy metal pollution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd91d5fe798ba2fc49905bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13100834
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper