PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2025Asian Review of Accounting3 citations

Beyond compliance: sustainability reporting challenges and the future of integrated reporting in Indonesia

View Full Paper
ISIwan SuhardjoCAChristopher AkroydMSMeiliana Suparman

Key Points

  • Mandatory sustainability reporting highlights four interrelated challenges, complicating compliance efforts.
  • A thematic analysis derived from semi-structured interviews with managers in Indonesian listed companies informs the findings.
  • Framework proliferation and resource constraints reinforce symbolic reporting despite stipulated requirements.
  • Invaluable insights for regulators suggest a need for standardized frameworks and sector-specific guidance.

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the challenges of mandatory sustainability reporting and the perceptions that managers have of integrated reporting (IR) in Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in stakeholder and institutional theories, this interpretivist study uses a qualitative methodology employing semi-structured interviews with managers from Indonesian listed companies. This study explores the experiences of managers with mandatory sustainability reporting and analyzes their views using thematic analysis. Findings Our findings extend prior research by identifying four interrelated sustainability reporting challenges: framework proliferation, materiality determination, assurance inadequacies, and resource constraints, forming a self-reinforcing cycle that perpetuates symbolic reporting despite mandatory requirements. Managers expressed a split view on IR, some saw it as a tool to improve communication, while others preferred separation to meet diverse audience needs. The study shows how organizations navigate institutional pressures and stakeholder expectations. These findings have timely implications for regulators, underscoring the need for standardized frameworks, sector guidance, and capacity building for meaningful adoption. Research limitations/implications While this study offers new insights, its focus on managerial perspectives is a limitation. Incorporating views from other stakeholders such as investors and regulators could provide other understandings of sustainability reporting challenges and IR adoption. Originality/value Our contribution lies in explaining how Indonesian listed companies navigate systemic sustainability reporting challenges under POJK51, conceptualizing these challenges as interlinked rather than discrete issues. By focusing on stakeholder and institutional tensions, we offer a grounded theoretical lens that can inform the design of future IR practices in developing countries.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suhardjo et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dd9537fe798ba2fc4996c0https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-06-2024-0190
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Double materiality and sustainability reporting: a qualitative study in a developing country2025 · 4 citations
  2. 2Integrated reporting and narrative accountability: the role of preparers2018 · 144 citations
  3. 3A Preliminary Analysis of SASB Reporting: Disclosure Topics, Financial Relevance, and the Financial Intensity of ESG Materiality2020 · 126 citations
  4. 4Is SDG reporting substantial or symbolic? An examination of controversial and environmentally sensitive industries2021 · 246 citations
  5. 5Corporate governance regulation in regulatory space of a developing country: actors, strategies and outcomes2023 · 14 citations