Objective: To compare the functional outcome of septoplasty in patients with high deviated nasal septum with and without spreader graft in terms of pre-and post-operative NOSE scores. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted among 60 patients, with high deviatednasal septum as the sole attributor to nasal obstruction, over a period of 2 years. The patients underwent septoplasty with or without spreader graft based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were assessed in terms of mean pre- and post-operative (at 1st and 3rd month follow up) NOSE scores and the data analysed. Both groups (patients undergoing septoplasty with spreader graft Results: and those without) had preoperative NOSE scores of 82.33 ±6.51 in the rst group and 81.46 ±7.04 in the second group respectively. Postoperatively, the group with spreader graft had mean NOSE score of 52±6.76 and 16.64 ±6.78 on follow up in the 1st month and 3rd month respectively, suggestive of signicant improvement in post-operative functional outcome(p<0.05). In the second group, mean NOSE score of 65.29±4.78 and 35.81±6.17 was noted in the 1st month and 3rd month of follow up post-operatively, which is statistically not signican. (p>0.05). Conclusion: Septoplasty with spreader graft shows signicant subjective and functional improvement in comparison to septoplasty without spreader graft in cases of high septal deviation with internal nasal valve compromised.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nilakhe et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: