Lyophilization improved solubility of dihydroquercetin in a solid-phase system with glycine, indicating potential for neurodegenerative treatments.
Introduction. Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia and imposes a heavy financial burden on society in developed countries. According to scientific information, flavonoids prevent the formation of β-amyloid plaques and tau aggregates, proteins that play a key role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. To overcome the biopharmaceutical limitations of flavonoids, it is proposed to obtain crystals with amino acids. Assuming a possible pharmacological synergism, the amino acid glycine, which is also capable of influencing links in the biochemical mechanisms of neurodegenerative diseases, was chosen as a conformer to dihydroquercetin flavanonol. Objective is to obtain and to characterize a solid-phase product of dihydroquercetin and glycine. Material and methods. The dihydroquercetin-glycine composition was obtained by lyophilization of their aqueous solution. The morphology was characterized by scanning electron microscopy. The crystallinity was demonstrated by X-ray powder diffraction spectra. The thermal analysis was performed by differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetry. The solubility in water was evaluated, according to SP RF XV. Results. Lyophilizate is a light-yellow powder. The form of these particles is thin flakes with a perforated surface, which have a significantly lower degree of crystallinity compared to the initial components. Crystallization of the amorphous flavonoid impurity in the composition is not observed, but we can see the phase transition from γ-glycine to α-glycine. According to SP RF XV, the solubility of resulting product is more than raw dihydroquercetin. Conclusion. The solid monophase dihydroquercetin-glycine system can be used to develop a new dosage form “Lyophilizate” (SP RF XV, PM.1.4.1.0031) and further preclinical study of safety and efficacy of neurodegenerative diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pankov et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: