Observational analysis identifies distinct clinical features of HEV infection in patients, indicating a growing public health concern.
This study analyses all cases of acute hepatitis E diagnosed in a southern Romanian hospital from 2019 to 2023. Patients with positive anti-HEV IgM antibodies were included in three groups: group A1—96 patients with probable HEV infection and ALT levels over 2.5-fold the upper limit of normal (ULN); group A2—44 patients with probable HEV infection and ALT levels under 2.5-fold ULN; group B—43 patients with probable HEV coinfection with another hepatotropic virus. Between 2019 and 2023, 642 patients were diagnosed with acute viral hepatitis. Positive anti-HEV IgM antibodies were detected in 183 (28.5%) cases, HEV being the second most common cause of acute viral hepatitis. Patients from group A were older than those from group B (47.26 ± 15.13 years vs. 35.95 ± 14.83 years, p < 0.01). Patients from group A were less likely to present clinical features compared to those from group B: digestive symptoms (73.8% vs. 97.2%, p < 0.01), jaundice (38.9% vs. 88.4%, p < 0.01), hepatomegaly (64.1% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.02). Patients from group A, compared to patients from group B, had lower levels of ALT (18.2 ± 29.9 ULN vs. 83.7 ± 56.2 ULN, p < 0.01) and total bilirubin (3.08 ± 5.2 mg/dL vs. 7.82 ± 5.25 mg/dL, p < 0.01) at admission. Patients from group A had higher levels of anti-HEV IgM antibodies (4.3 ± 3.22 vs. 2.55 ± 1.34, p < 0.01) than those from group B. Nearly all patients had no history of travel; therefore, autochthonous origin of HEV is involved in a large majority of cases. Currently, hepatitis E virus is not an uncommon aetiology of acute hepatitis in Romania, more often in adults and elderly patients. The epidemiological and clinical features of HEV infections plead for a zoonotic transmission in most cases. The significant number of cases of hepatitis E diagnosed in a single centre in Bucharest justifies the need to include early testing for HEV in patients with acute hepatitis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Popescu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: