Retrospective study reveals treatment response and prognosis differences in sinonasal aspergillosis, indicating a significant link with sinusitis.
Introduction: Canine sinonasal aspergillosis (SNA) can present singular as a primary disease or secondary to concurrent sinonasal pathology. We hypothesized that treatment response and prognosis differ between both forms, particularly when sinusitis is present. Methods: In this retrospective study, 30 dogs with SNA were categorized as either group pA (primary aspergillosis) or group sA (secondary aspergillosis; with additional sinonasal pathology). History, diagnostics, endoscopic therapeutic intervention of affected nose and sinus, and follow-up data were analyzed. Results: Group pA included 19/30 dogs (63%), with 15 dogs (79%) showing concurrent sinusitis. Group sA included 11/30 dogs (37%; additional conditions: foreign bodies, dental pathologies, frontal bone fracture). Only 2/11 sA dogs (18%) had sinusitis. Follow-ups in group pA were more frequent than in group sA (p = 0.04). Need for re-treatments differed significantly between groups (p = 0.02) and in dogs with sinusitis, regardless of group (p < 0.001). In group sA, treating the underlying condition plus single endoscopic debridement ± antifungal therapy led to clinical resolution in 11 of 12 dogs (92%). Conclusions: Primary SNA is frequently associated with sinusitis, requires aggressive repeated antifungal therapy, and may not achieve a definitive cure. Secondary SNA is usually confined to the nasal cavity, responds well to underlying condition treatment, carries better prognosis, and requires fewer antifungal treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rösch et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: