Theoretical extension of stochastic portfolio theory shows cost-adjusted wealth management in markets, implying relative arbitrage opportunities.
Assuming frictionless trading, classical stochastic portfolio theory (SPT) provides relative arbitrage strategies. However, the costs associated with real-world execution are state-dependent, volatile, and under increasing stress during liquidity shocks. Using an Ito diffusion that may be connected with asset prices, we extend SPT to a continuous-time equity market with proportional, stochastic transaction costs. We derive closed-form lower bounds on cost-adjusted relative wealth for a large class of functionally generated portfolios; these bounds provide sufficient conditions for relative arbitrage to survive random costs. A limit-order-book cost proxy in conjunction with a Milstein scheme validates the theoretical order-of-magnitude estimates. Finally, we use intraday bid-ask spreads as a stand-in for cost volatility in a back-test of CRSP small-cap data (1994--2024). Despite experiencing larger declines during the 2008 and 2020 liquidity crises, diversity- and entropy-weighted portfolios continue to beat the value-weighted benchmark by 3.6 and 2.9 percentage points annually, respectively, after cost deduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karimi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: