Numerical analysis reveals EMAC formulation improves simulation performance at Reynolds numbers 500 and 1000, suggesting its potential advantages.
We consider a test problem for Navier-Stokes solvers based on the flow around a cylinder at Reynolds numbers 500 and 1000, where the solution is observed to be periodic when the problem is sufficiently resolved. Computing the resulting flow is a challenge, even for exactly divergence-free discretization methods, when the scheme does not include sufficient numerical dissipation. We examine the performance of the energy, momentum and angular momentum conserving (EMAC) formulation of the Navier-Stokes equations. This incorporates more physical conservation into the finite element method even when the numerical solution is not exactly divergence-free. Consequently, it has a chance to outperform standard methods, especially for long-time simulations. We find that for lowest-order Taylor-Hood elements, EMAC outperforms the standard convective formulations. However, for higher-order elements, EMAC can become unstable on under-resolved meshes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wahl et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: