Background: Uncontrolled asthma remains a significant clinical challenge, often linked to impaired lung function and increased diaphragmatic workload. Recent studies have shown promising results using a triple inhaled therapy comprising beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium (BDP/FF/G). This study assessed the real-world efficacy of BDP/FF/G on lung function and diaphragmatic workload in patients with uncontrolled asthma. Methods: A prospective observational study enrolled 21 adult patients diagnosed with uncontrolled asthma despite high-dose ICS/LABA therapy. Patients underwent lung function tests and right diaphragmatic ultrasound assessments at baseline and after three months of treatment with BDP/FF/G (172/5/9 mcg, administered as two inhalations every 12 h). Results: After three months, significant improvements were observed in FEV1 (from 57.75 ± 12.30% to 75.10 ± 18.94%, p < 0.001) and FEF25–75 (from 47.80 ± 19.23% to 75.10 ± 36.06%, p < 0.001). Additionally, during the same period, we recorded significant reductions in residual volume (from 130.10 ± 28.20% to 92.55 ± 21.18%, p < 0.001) and total airway resistance (Rtot) (from 164.60 ± 83.21% to 140.70 ± 83.25%, p < 0.05). The mean asthma control test (ACT) score increased by 5.6 points (p < 0.001), surpassing the established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 3 points and raising the cohort mean above the well-controlled threshold. The right diaphragmatic workload was significantly decreased, as shown by a reduction in thickening fraction (TF) (from 63.86 ± 17.67% to 40.29 ± 16.65%, p < 0.01). Correlation analysis indicated significant associations between diaphragmatic function and some lung function parameters (FEV1, FEF25–75, and Rtot). Conclusions: In this real-world pilot, triple BDP/FF/G was linked to improvements in airflow, hyperinflation, symptoms, and a reduction in diaphragmatic thickening fraction, indicating potential physiological benefit. Due to the small sample size, single-centre design, and 3-month follow-up, these results should be viewed as hypothesis-generating and need to be confirmed in larger, controlled, multicentre studies with longer follow-up.
Maiorano et al. (2025) studied this question.