PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 2025Technologies34 citationsOpen Access

Overview of Existing Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods Used in Industrial Environments

View Full Paper
TATanya AvramovaTechnical University of VarnaTPTeodora PenevaTechnical University of VarnaAIA. L. IvanovAngel Kanchev University of Ruse

Key Points

  • The analysis reveals that various multi-criteria decision-making methods significantly enhance decision quality in manufacturing, leading to improved competitiveness.
  • Among the methods reviewed, the analytic hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution are highlighted for their application strengths.
  • The structured literature and patent review focuses on leading multi-criteria decision-making techniques, including the full consistency method and analytic network process.
  • This review emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate decision-making tools based on the strengths and limitations of each method in industrial contexts.

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate technological process is essential to achieve optimal results in manufacturing companies. This affects quality, efficiency and competitiveness. In the modern industry, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are increasingly used to evaluate, optimize and solve various manufacturing challenges. In this review article, existing methodologies and patents related to optimization and decision making are investigated. The main characteristics and applications of the methods are outlined. The purpose of this article is to provide a systematic review and evaluation of the main MCDM methods used in industrial practice, including through an analysis of relevant methodologies and patents. The methodology involves a structured literature and patent review, focusing on applications of widely used MCDM techniques such as the AHP (analytic hierarchy process), ANP (analytic network process), FUCOM (full consistency method), TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution), and VIKOR (višekriterijumsko kompromisno rangiranje). The analysis outlines each method’s strengths, limitations and areas of applicability. Special attention is given to the potential of the FUCOM for process evaluation in manufacturing. The findings are intended to guide researchers and practitioners in selecting appropriate decision-making tools based on specific industrial contexts and objectives. In conclusion, from the comparative analysis made, the methodologies reveal their advantages and disadvantages as well as limitations that arise in their application.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Avramova et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de68e583cbc991d0a2118fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/technologies13100444
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluating Sustainable Materials for Automotive Applications Through Comprehensive MCDM Analysis Using CODAS, COPRAS, VIKOR, and ENTROPY2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2An application of the analytic network process in multiple criteria material selection2012 · 58 citations
  3. 3How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process1990 · 9,545 citations
  4. 4A Review of TOPSIS Method for Multi Criteria Optimization in Manufacturing Environment2020 · 28 citations
  5. 5Toward Sustainable Urban Mobility by Using Fuzzy-FUCOM and Fuzzy-CoCoSo Methods: The Case of the SUMP Podgorica2022 · 87 citations