Mixed methods study examines changes in interprofessional socialisation among educators, highlighting its role in collaborative patient care.
Aim Interprofessional socialisation can contribute to collaborative patient care. Although there is research regarding interprofessional socialisation of healthcare students and frontline staff, there is limited literature regarding healthcare educators in practice settings. Our aim was to examine interprofessional socialisation of healthcare educators in the practice setting following an interprofessional simulation facilitator training programme. Design Explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Methods Quantitative provincial simulation programme evaluation data from 2022 and 2023 ( n = 87) were analysed and used to inform qualitative interviews ( n = 17). Qualitative and quantitative data were integrated following independent analysis. Results There was a statistically significant increase in attitudes toward interprofessional socialisation following the simulation facilitator training programme. Qualitative findings revealed themes regarding interprofessional socialisation: (a) benefits gained through interprofessional socialisation, (b) interprofessional, uniprofessional or both, (c) facilitators to interprofessional socialisation, (d) barriers to interprofessional socialisation and (e) opportunities to strengthen interprofessional socialisation. Conclusion Despite positive views of interprofessional socialisation, socialisation behaviours may not be consistent in a variety of contexts. Interprofessional education may increase interprofessional socialisation among educators. Implications for the Profession It is important to provide interprofessional socialisation opportunities for educators to promote more interprofessional education initiatives. Impact The findings of this study provided insights into how to foster interprofessional socialisation in existing structures and how new pathways might be built to connect educators. Reporting Method This study is reported in congruence with the Journal Article Reporting Standards—Mixed Methods, Quantitative, and Qualitative Standards provided on the Equator Network. Public Contribution Members of the provincial simulation team were consulted regarding study design and data collection to optimise participation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dolan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: