Analysis reveals significant differences in seismic responses of prefabricated subway stations in soft soil, indicating design optimizations are needed.
With the continuous improvement of the prefabricated modular technology system, the prefabricated subway station structures are widely used in underground engineering projects. However, prefabricated subway stations in soft soil can suffer significant adverse effects under seismic action. In order to study the seismic performance of a prefabricated subway station, this work is based on an actual project of a subway station in soft soil. And the nonlinear static and dynamic coupling two-dimensional finite element models of cast-in-place structures (CIPs), assembly splicing structures (ASSs), and assembly monolithic structures (AMSs) are established, respectively. The soil-structure interaction is considered, and different peak ground accelerations (PGA) are selected for incremental dynamic analysis. The displacement response, internal force characteristics, and structural damage distribution for three structural forms are compared. The research results show that the inter-story displacement of the AMS is slightly greater than that of the CIP, while the inter-story displacement of the ASS is the largest. The CIP has the highest internal force in the middle column, the ASS has the lowest internal force in the middle column, and the AMS is between the two. The damage to the CIP is concentrated at the bottom of the middle column and sidewall. The AMS compression damage moves upward, but the tensile damage mode is similar to the CIP. The ASS can effectively reduce damage to the middle column and achieve redistribution of internal force. Further analysis shows that the joint splicing interface between cast-in-place and prefabricated components is the key to controlling the overall deformation and seismic performance of the structure. The research results can provide a theoretical basis for the seismic design optimization of subway stations in earthquake-prone areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: