PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 2025Hepatology Research3 citationsOpen Access

Pre‐Treatment Liver Stiffness Is a Stronger Predictor of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development Than Post‐Treatment Liver Stiffness After Hepatitis C Virus Eradication

View Full Paper
TNT. NakatsukaRNRyo NakagomiKMKeisuke Mabuchi

Key Points

  • Pre-treatment liver stiffness measurement is a stronger predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma than post-treatment values.
  • In a follow-up of 5.7 years, 28 patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma, showing that pre-treatment values impact risk significantly.
  • Higher values of pre-treatment liver stiffness and FIB-4 significantly correlate with increased hepatocellular carcinoma risk after treatment.
  • Patients with decreased liver stiffness did maintain higher metabolic risk factors, highlighting the need for continuous surveillance.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) values decrease after hepatitis C virus eradication. However, whether this reduction translates into a reduced risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in patients who achieve sustained virological response (SVR) remains unclear. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 501 patients with chronic hepatitis C who achieved SVR after direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) treatment. LSM and FIB‐4 levels were measured before DAA treatment and at multiple follow‐up points. Time‐dependent Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association between these time‐dependent markers and HCC development. Results LSM and FIB‐4 significantly decreased after DAA treatment in 80.4% and 70.8% of patients, respectively. During a mean follow‐up of 5.7 years, 28 patients developed HCC, and in 57% of them, LSM was reduced to < 10 kPa and FIB‐4 to < 3.25 at HCC diagnosis. Multivariable analysis revealed higher pre‐treatment LSM (adjusted hazard ratio aHR, 8.10; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.82–35.95) and higher pre‐treatment FIB‐4 (aHR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.11–1.51) as independent predictors of HCC, while post‐treatment values at any time point showed no significant association. Patients with LSM < 10 kPa at HCC diagnosis showed better liver function and less fibrosis, but more metabolic risk factors and excessive alcohol consumption than those with LSM ≥ 10 kPa. Conclusion Pre‐treatment LSM and FIB‐4 were stronger predictors of post‐SVR HCC risk than post‐treatment values. Patients with higher pre‐treatment values remained at an increased risk of HCC development even if these values decreased after DAA treatment, emphasizing the importance of continued HCC surveillance in this group.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nakatsuka et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de6f3f83cbc991d0a22ab7https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.70047
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Post-treatment LSM rather than change during treatment predicts decompensation in patients with cACLD after HCV cure2024 · 30 citations
  2. 2Risk stratification of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatitis C virus eradication in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease in Japan2022 · 4 citations
  3. 3A nationwide survey on non-B, non-C hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: 2011–2015 update2018 · 246 citations
  4. 4Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after sustained virological response in Veterans with hepatitis C virus infection2016 · 408 citations
  5. 5Baveno VII – Renewing consensus in portal hypertension2021 · 2,852 citations