This journal focuses on neo-Victorian literature and culture, highlighting a quick publication process.
Short answer: very good. This publication, in its sixth volume at the time of writing, is a scholar-led, open-access journal focusing on the "neo-Victorian" period, be that in literature or culture. As can be seen from the data below, I had a relatively quick publication experience with the journal. I had two reviews returned within a very reasonable period and publication followed not too long thereafter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Paul Eve (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: