Open peer review and its rhythms

Martin Paul Eve

doi:10.59348/bqze8-6n509

August 30, 2022Open Access

Open peer review and its rhythms

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Open peer review enhances transparency and allows for broader feedback during the review process.
Kathleen Fitzpatrick's manuscript _Leading Generously_ serves as a case study to understand these dynamics.
Engagement in open peer review can elevate scholarly conversations and contribute to community knowledge.
This approach may challenge traditional academic norms and reshape the publishing landscape.

Implication

This assessment highlights the process of open peer review in a book manuscript, indicating its potential benefits.

Abstract

I was lucky enough, recently, to get a slightly-ahead-of-general-release opportunity to openly peer review Kathleen Fitzpatrick's most recent book manuscript, _Leading Generously_.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Martin Paul Eve (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de70f583cbc991d0a23663 https://doi.org/10.59348/bqze8-6n509

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Open peer review and its rhythms

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Open peer review and its rhythms

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading