Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review evaluates efficacy of biologics and conventional treatments for endoscopic postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease, suggesting biologics are more effective.
Background: As no direct comparison is available between drugs to prevent endoscopic postoperative recurrence (POR) in Crohn’s disease (CD), hierarchizing these therapeutic options remains challenging. Objectives: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of treatments to prevent CD endoscopic POR. Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Data sources and methods: We include studies comparing treatments to prevent CD POR according to PRISMA guidelines. The primary endpoint was endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts score ⩾i2). Surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) was used to hierarchize the treatments. Results: Twenty studies were included (2414 patients). Overall heterogeneity was moderate (τ = 0.34). Ustekinumab (odds ratio (OR) = 0.23 (0.07–0.70); OR = 0.29 (0.08–0.99)), vedolizumab (OR = 0.17 (0.05–0.59); OR = 0.22 (0.06–0.85)), infliximab (OR = 0.18 (0.36–0.88); OR = 0.23 (0.09–0.54)), and adalimumab (OR = 0.17 (0.07–0.42); OR = 0.22 (0.08–0.59)) were more effective to prevent endoscopic POR than placebo or 5-ASA, respectively, contrary to thiopurines (OR = 0.52 (0.22–1.24); OR = 0.66 (0.25–1.76)). Adalimumab (OR = 0.33 (0.15–0.74)) and infliximab (OR = 0.34 (0.13–0.87)) were more effective than thiopurines. While no difference was observed between the four biologics, adalimumab (SUCRA = 0.81), infliximab (SUCRA = 0.80), vedolizumab (SUCRA = 0.79), and ustekinumab (SUCRA = 0.72) had the highest likelihood of being the most effective drug, contrary to thiopurines (SUCRA = 0.41), 5-ASA (SUCRA = 0.24), or placebo (SUCRA = 0.16). Conclusion: This network meta-analysis confirms the efficacy of anti-TNF agents, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab in preventing endoscopic CD POR without any difference between them. When a prophylactic therapy is needed, biologics should be preferred to 5-ASA or thiopurines. Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42024555528.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hupé et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: