Quasi-experimental design improved writing outcomes in undergraduates with AI support, suggesting benefits of co-regulated learning.
English writing proficiency is pivotal to sustainable academic success and employability. In Chinese higher education, however, conventional instruction often constrains students’ self-regulation and access to individualized feedback. Drawing on self-regulated learning (SRL) and co-regulated learning (CoRL), this study investigates whether a CoRL-guided generative AI virtual teacher (CoRL-VT), designed as a “more capable other,” is associated with enhanced undergraduate writing outcomes relative to standard AI support. Using a 12-week quasi-experimental design with two intact classes (N = 61) in Anhui, China, we compared a control condition (standard AI) with an intervention (CoRL-VT). Writing proficiency was assessed via IELTS Writing Task 2 at pre- and post-test; three certified examiners scored all scripts with strong agreement (ICC = 0.87). Analyses adjusting for baseline yielded an estimated group difference favoring CoRL-VT. Teacher interview testimony aligned with the quantitative pattern, noting clearer macro-organization, richer lexical choices, and more teacherly formative feedback among CoRL-VT students. Taken together, these findings offer exploratory, descriptive evidence consistent with the potential of structured, CoRL-informed AI scaffolding in sustainable writing pedagogy and outline design principles for replicable CoRL-VT implementations in resource-conscious contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: