Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights 3D printing and its benefits for zirconia restorations, suggesting implications for digital dentistry.
Zirconia, also known as zirconium dioxide, or ZrO₂, is a preferred ceramic material in dentistry because of its superior durability, chemical resistance, and compatibility with biological processes. The increasing demand for monolithic zirconia, which has traditionally been used as a substructure material in bilayer restorations, has led to advancements in manufacturing techniques. Although subtractive manufacturing (milling) is still the main technique for producing zirconia restorations, additive manufacturing (3D printing) has also emerged as an innovative techniques with remarkable benefits such as improved material efficiency, complex design possibilities and reduced material waste. Resolution restrictions, interlayer bonding concerns, and porosity continue to be difficulties, nevertheless, and demanding post-processing techniques like sintering and debinding are necessary to provide the greatest mechanical and aesthetic properties. According to recent research, 3D-printed zirconia offers marginal fit and adaptation that are clinically acceptable and mechanically comparable to those produced with subtractive manufacturing. Nonetheless, factors such as layer alignment, sintering settings, and margin design significantly influence the accuracy and durability of the final restoration. More long-term study is required to establish standardized techniques and evaluate the therapeutic usefulness of additively produced zirconia, as its clinical applicability has not been sufficiently explored despite the encouraging results. This review examines the latest developments, advantages and disadvantages of additive manufacturing for zirconia restorations, emphasizing its potential to advance digital dentistry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karabulut‐Açıkgöz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: