Systematic assessment of SDGSAT-1 enhances smoke detection and fire point identification during wildfires, suggesting improved monitoring capabilities.
Advancements in remote sensing technology have enabled the acquisition of high spatial and radiometric resolution imagery, offering abundant and reliable data sources for forest fire monitoring. In order to explore the ability of Sustainable Development Science Satellite 1 (SDGSAT-1) in wildfire monitoring, a systematic and comprehensive study was proposed on smoke detection during the wildfire early warning phase, fire point identification during the fire occurrence, and burned area delineation after the wildfire. The smoke detection effect of SDGSAT-1 was analyzed by machine learning and the discriminating potential of SDGSAT-1 burned area was discussed by Mid-Infrared Burn Index (MIRBI) and Normalized Burn Ratio 2 (NBR2). In addition, compared with Sentinel-2, the fixed-threshold method and the two-channel fixed-threshold plus contextual approach are further used to demonstrate the performance of SDGSAT-1 in fire point identification. The results show that the average accuracy of SDGSAT-1 fire burned area recognition is 90.21%, and a clear fire boundary can be obtained. The average smoke detection precision is 81.72%, while the fire point accuracy is 97.40%, and the minimum identified fire area is 0.0009 km2, which implies SDGSAT-1 offers significant advantages in the early detection and identification of small-scale fires, which is significant in fire emergency and disposal. The performance of fire point detection is superior to that of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8. SDGSAT-1 demonstrates great potential in monitoring the entire process of wildfire occurrence, development, and evolution. With its higher-resolution satellite imagery, it has become an important data source for monitoring in the field of remote sensing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: