PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 2025Education + Training8 citations

Governance structures and systemic challenges shaping the future of the technical and vocational education and training (TVET) workforce

View Full Paper
NRNur Hairani Abd RahmanYZYong Zulina ZubairiRJRohana Jani

Key Points

  • Fragmented governance adversely affects coordinated efforts in technical and vocational education and training.
  • Weak industry-academia collaboration limits alignment with labor market needs, impacting workforce readiness.
  • Soft skills gaps and limited practical training contribute significantly to workforce development challenges.
  • Equity concerns, including gender disparities, pose challenges for policy implementation and career progression.

Abstract

Purpose The study examines how governance structures and systemic factors undermine technical and vocational education and training (TVET) workforce development, addressing key research gaps and offering actionable insights for reform. Design/methodology/approach Utilizing a qualitative approach, the study draws on semi-structured interviews with 28 key stakeholders across Malaysia’s TVET landscape, including public and private sector representatives, policymakers, training providers, and industry experts. Findings Findings indicate that fragmented governance and overlapping mandates hinder coordinated TVET efforts. Industry-academia collaboration remains weak, limiting alignment with labor market needs. Workforce readiness is affected by soft skills gaps and limited practical training. Policy implementation challenges include gender disparities and slow career progression. Originality/value This study offers a unique contribution by critically examining how governance structures and systemic challenges undermine TVET workforce development, addressing gaps in the literature that often overlook these complexities. Unlike previous research focused on curriculum alignment or skills development, it highlights fragmented administration, equity concerns like gender disparities, and limited industry engagement as key barriers. Drawing on diverse stakeholder perspectives within Malaysia, the study provides actionable insights for reform, aiming to enhance the responsiveness, inclusivity, and effectiveness of TVET systems. Its governance-centric approach and focus on equity issues present valuable implications for global TVET discourse and policy development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rahman et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de84b65b556a9128e1b664https://doi.org/10.1108/et-11-2024-0508
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROSPECT FOR HIGHER LEARNING INSTITUTION2024 · 6 citations
  2. 2Determining Gender Issues in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) and its Influencing Factors in the Philippines2024 · 5 citations
  3. 3The European Vocational Education and Training System: Towards a Unified Approach2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Increasing the Enrolment of Women and Girls in TVET in Africa through the Women in Technical Education and Development (WITED)2022 · 2 citations
  5. 5Challenges Experienced by TVET Colleges in Producing Skilled Workforces2022 · 3 citations