PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 2025Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics6 citations

Lack of Association Between Hemoglobin A1c and Continuous Glucose Monitor Metrics Among Individuals with Prediabetes and Normoglycemia

View Full Paper
JRJorge A. RodriguezNPNadine E. PalermoWSWenyu Song

Key Points

  • Individuals with prediabetes and normoglycemia exhibited minimal associations between HbA1c and CGM metrics.
  • In type 2 diabetes, mean glucose showed the strongest association with HbA1c (standardized β = 0.79, P < 0.001).
  • CGM metrics in normoglycemia displayed weak relation to HbA1c, indicating limited interpretation for these individuals.
  • Findings highlight the need to reconsider the interpretation of CGM metrics among prediabetic and normoglycemic individuals.

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) are becoming increasingly available, yet the relationship between CGM metrics and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among individuals with prediabetes and normoglycemia remains unclear. We examined associations between HbA1c and eight CGM metrics across glycemic status. Our cohort included 972 individuals: 421 (43.3%) with type 2 diabetes, 319 (32.8%) with prediabetes, and 232 (23.9%) with normoglycemia. Associations were strongest in type 2 diabetes, with mean glucose showing the strongest relationships (standardized β = 0.79, P < 0.001). In prediabetes, associations were substantially attenuated, with mean glucose showing moderate association (standardized β = 0.22, P < 0.001). Among individuals with normoglycemia, CGM metrics showed minimal associations with HbA1c, with mean glucose demonstrating a weak association (standardized β = 0.10, P = 0.022) and time in range showing no significant relationship. All interaction terms were statistically significant (P < 0.001). These findings suggest that standard CGM metrics should not be interpreted to reflect HbA1c for individuals with prediabetes and normoglycemia.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rodriguez et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de84bf5b556a9128e1bbc4https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251379506
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Defining Continuous Glucose Monitor Time in Range in a Large, Community-Based Cohort Without Diabetes2024 · 34 citations
  2. 2Novel Detection and Progression Markers for Diabetes Based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Dynamics2024 · 37 citations
  3. 3Expert Clinical Interpretation of Continuous Glucose Monitor Reports From Individuals Without Diabetes2025 · 7 citations
  4. 4AI-READI: rethinking AI data collection, preparation and sharing in diabetes research and beyond2024 · 34 citations
  5. 5Rates and Correlates of Uptake of Continuous Glucose Monitors Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care and Endocrinology Settings2023 · 71 citations