Observational analysis improved potato yield and quality with nitrogen rates and plant density, indicating effective farming practices.
The problems of excessive nitrogen fertilizer application and mismatch between varieties and planting density are common in potato production in the dryland farming areas of Loess Plateau, and it is of great significance to select suitable nitrogen application rates and planting densities for the green and sustainable production of dryland potatoes in this area. In this study, Longshu 16 was selected as the potato variety, and we investigated two nitrogen application rates: 200 kg·hm−2 (N1), 300 kg·hm−2 (N2); and three planting densities: 37,500 plants·hm−2 (D1), 52,500 plants·hm−2 (D2), 67,500 plants·hm−2 (D3). The effects of different nitrogen fertilization rates and planting densities on photosynthetic characteristics, leaf carbon and nitrogen metabolism enzyme activities, and yield and quality of potato were measured and analyzed. The results showed that during the tuber swelling stage, the activity of ribose-1,5-diphosphate carboxylase oxygenase (Rubisco) in potato leaves was increased by 9.05%. During the starch accumulation stage, the activity of glutamine synthetase (GS) in potato leaves was increased by 3.02~22.34% in N1D2 treatment compared with other treatments, and the activity of glutamate synthase (GOGAT) was increased by 2.83~7.35% compared with other treatments. During the starch accumulation stage, the activity of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) in potato leaves was increased by 7.85~31.17% in N1D2 treatment compared with other treatments. The contents of protein, starch, vitamin C, and calcium in potato tubers in N1D2 treatment were the highest, and the yield was the highest in N1D2 treatment. In conclusion, the recommended nitrogen application rate of 200 kg·hm−2 and planting density of 52,500 plants·hm−2 in dry-fed potato production improved the yield and quality of potato by enhancing activities of GAPDH, GS, and AGPase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: