PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 2025Nature Communications9 citationsOpen Access

A brain-inspired agentic architecture to improve planning with LLMs

View Full Paper
TWTaylor W. WebbSMShanka Subhra MondalIMIda Momennejad

Key Points

  • MAP significantly enhances planning performance in large language models, yielding better results across various tasks.
  • On tasks like graph traversal and Tower of Hanoi, MAP outperforms standard LLMs and competitive agentic baselines.
  • This study proposes a modular approach where specialized brain-inspired LLM modules interact for effective planning.
  • Improvement in task coordination highlights the potential of cognitive neuroscience to inform LLM architecture design.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive performance on a wide variety of tasks, but they often struggle with tasks that require multi-step reasoning or goal-directed planning. To address this, we take inspiration from the human brain, in which planning is accomplished via component processes that are predominantly associated with specific brain regions. These processes include conflict monitoring, state prediction, state evaluation, task decomposition, and task coordination. We find that LLMs are often capable of carrying out these functions in isolation, but struggle to autonomously coordinate them in the service of a goal. Therefore, we propose a modular agentic architecture - the Modular Agentic Planner (MAP) - in which planning is performed via the interaction of specialized brain-inspired LLM modules. We evaluate MAP on three challenging planning tasks – graph traversal, Tower of Hanoi, and the PlanBench benchmark – as well as an NLP task requiring multi-step reasoning (strategyQA). We find that MAP yields significant improvements over both standard LLM methods and competitive agentic baselines, can be effectively combined with smaller and more cost-efficient LLMs, and displays superior transfer across tasks. These results demonstrate the benefit of utilizing knowledge from cognitive neuroscience to improve planning in LLMs. Multi-step planning is a challenge for LLMs. Here, the authors introduce a brain-inspired Modular Agentic Planner that decomposes planning into specialized LLM modules, improving performance across tasks and highlighting the value of cognitive neuroscience for LLM design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Webb et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68dfa9f12808bcf356ab6c3bhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63804-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ArCHer: Training Language Model Agents via Hierarchical Multi-Turn RL2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Embodied Task Planning with Large Language Models2023 · 18 citations
  3. 3Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with the MAXQ Value Function Decomposition2000 · 1,460 citations
  4. 4A Training Data Recipe to Accelerate A* Search with Language Models2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Symbolic Architectures for Cognition1989 · 83 citations