Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective study finds low DVT prevalence of 0.9% in spine surgery patients, suggesting limited screening value for most cases.
Background: Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) is a serious complication of spine surgery, with the potential to cause fatal pulmonary embolism. The value of routine preoperative screening with Doppler ultrasound remains controversial and relatively understudied. Objective: To determine the prevalence of lower-extremity DVT in patients undergoing elective lumbosacral spine surgery. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional prospective study was conducted on 114 consecutive patients scheduled for elective lumbosacral spine surgery at our institution. All patients underwent bilateral lower-extremity Doppler ultrasonography (DUS) prior to surgery. Demographic data and comorbidities were recorded and analyzed. Results: The mean age of patients was 54.5 ± 12.1 years, and 68.4% were female. Preoperative DUS detected DVT in only one patient (0.9%), who had a history of malignancy. Surgery was canceled, and anticoagulation therapy was initiated. No other patients showed evidence of thrombosis. A secondary aim of the study was to explore the potential risk factors for DVT, if a sufficient number of DVT-positive cases were identified. However, since only one case was detected, meaningful statistical analysis was not feasible. Conclusion: In this study, the prevalence of preoperative DVT in elective lumbosacral spine surgery patients was extremely low (0.9%). Our findings suggest that routine preoperative Doppler screening has limited value in the general spine surgery population. However, screening should be considered for high-risk patients. As this remains a relatively understudied topic, further research is warranted to define optimal screening strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hejazian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: