Novel framework combines high-intensity ultrasound and biomarker analysis to improve breast cancer grading and monitoring.
Background: Accurate and noninvasive breast cancer grading and therapy monitoring remain critical challenges in oncology. Traditional methods often rely on invasive histopathological assessments or imaging-only techniques, which may not fully capture the molecular and morphological intricacies of tumor response. Method: This article presents a novel, noninvasive framework for breast cancer analysis and therapy monitoring that combines two parallel mechanisms: (1) a dual-stream convolutional neural network (CNN) processing high-intensity ultrasound images, and (2) a biomarker-aware CNN stream utilizing patient-specific breast cancer biomarkers, including carbohydrate antigen 15-3, carcinoembryonic antigen, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 levels. The imaging stream extracts spatial and morphological features, while the biomarker stream encodes quantitative molecular indicators, enabling a multimodal understanding of tumor characteristics. The outputs from both streams are fused to predict the cancer grade (G1-G3) with high reliability. Results: Experimental evaluation on a cohort of pre- and postchemotherapy patients demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed approach, achieving an overall grading accuracy of 97.8%, with an area under the curve of 0.981 for malignancy classification. The model also enables quantitative post-therapy analysis, revealing an average tumor response improvement of 41.3% across the test set, as measured by predicted regression in grade and changes in biomarker-imaging correlation. Conclusions: This dual-parallel artificial intelligence strategy offers a promising noninvasive alternative to traditional histopathological and imaging-alone methods, supporting real-time cancer monitoring and personalized treatment evaluation. The integration of high-resolution imaging with biomolecular data significantly enhances diagnostic depth, paving the way for intelligent, patient-specific breast cancer management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parwekar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: