PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 2025The Journal of Chemical Physics2 citations

Redundant parameter dependencies in conventional and quantum linear response and equation of motion theory for unitary parameterized wave functions

View Full Paper
EKErik Rosendahl KjellgrenPRPeter ReinholdtKZKarl Michael Ziems

Key Points

  • Calculated excitation energies vary based on orbital choice, even with ground-state FCI solutions, emphasizing the limitations of linear response methods.
  • For a simple model system, applying the linear response approach demonstrates sensitivity to the parameterization method used for operators.
  • Addressing this sensitivity through ground-state constrained trace optimization of the Hessian matrix enhances linear response results.
  • Constrained state-averaged UCC further improves spectral calculations, offering a promising direction for complex systems.

Abstract

Extracting molecular properties from a wave function can be performed through the linear response (LR) formalism or, equivalently, the equation of motion (EOM) formalism. For a simple model system, He in a 6-31G basis, it is shown here that calculated excitation energies depend on the specifically chosen orbitals, even when the ground-state is the FCI solution, if the LR is truncated to a singles expansion. This holds for naïve, projected, self-consistent, and state-transfer parameterizations of the LR operators. With a focus on the state-transfer parameterization, this problem is shown to also hold for more complicated systems and is also present when the LR is truncated to singles and doubles. This problem can be alleviated by performing a ground-state constrained trace optimization of the Hessian matrix before performing the LR calculation. It is finally shown that spectra can be further improved for small LR expansions by targeting only a few states in the constrained trace optimization using constrained state-averaged UCC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kjellgren et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e02f2cf0e39f13e7fa1ec9https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0284287
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Estimating Molecular Thermal Averages with the Quantum Equation of Motion and Informationally Complete Measurements2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics with Fermionic Subspace-Expansion Algorithms on Quantum Computers2024 · 12 citations
  3. 3Estimating Molecular Thermal Averages with the Quantum Equation of Motion and Informationally Complete Measurements2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4Hyperfine Coupling Constants on Quantum Computers: Performance, Errors, and Future Prospects2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Electric Field Gradient Calculations for Ice VIII and IX Using Polarizable Embedding: A Comparative Study on Classical Computers and Quantum Simulators2024 · 5 citations