PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 2025Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research4 citationsOpen Access

Sinus Floor Elevation With Platelet‐Rich Fibrin From Horizontal Centrifugation and Xenograft: Randomized Clinical Trial

View Full Paper
GRGabriel Guerra David ReisRDRicardo Júnior DenardiSSSérgio Luı́s Scombatti de Souza

Key Points

  • Significantly higher newly formed bone observed in the DBBM + H-PRF group, enhancing sinus augmentation outcomes.
  • Histomorphometric analysis revealed 51.33% bone formation with DBBM + H-PRF, compared to 45.68% for DBBM alone.
  • Micro-CT confirmed greater bone volume and connectivity density in the test group after 4 months compared to the control.
  • Investigating long-term effects on dental implant stability is needed for comprehensive evaluation.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the effects of maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) using deproteinized bovine bone material (DBBM) combined with or without platelet‐rich fibrin obtained by horizontal centrifugation (H‐PRF) after a short healing period of 4 months. Materials and Methods Thirteen patients underwent bilateral two‐stage MSA using a split‐mouth model. Each side was randomly assigned to receive DBBM alone (control group) or DBBM + H‐PRF (test group). Bone tissue samples were harvested 4 months after implant placement and evaluated using microcomputed tomography (micro‐CT), as well as histological and histomorphometric analyses. Data were statistically analyzed using paired t ‐tests (Wilcoxon signed‐rank test; p < 0.05). Results Histomorphometric analysis demonstrated higher amounts ( p < 0.05) of newly formed bone in the DBBM + H‐PRF group compared to the control group (51.33% ± 6.17% versus 45.68% ± 6.65%, respectively). Micro‐CT also revealed significantly higher bone volume (30.38% ± 11.24% and 21.38% ± 9.83%, respectively) and connectivity density (4485 ± 1469 and 2562 ± 1271, respectively) in the DBBM + H‐PRF group than in the DBBM‐alone group ( p < 0.05). Conclusions Compared with DBBM alone, maxillary sinuses augmented with H‐PRF combined with DBBM exhibited improved qualitative and quantitative new bone formation after 4 months of healing. However, the effects on the long‐term survival and early stability of dental implants remain unknown and warrant further investigation with long‐term follow‐up.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Reis et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e02f34f0e39f13e7fa2384https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.70093
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper