Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This technique enables efficient DNA extraction from urine in under 30 minutes, suggesting improvements in UTI diagnostics.
Rapid and reliable DNA extraction from urine is a critical bottleneck in advancing molecular diagnostics for urinary tract infections (UTIs) in both centralized and decentralized settings. Here, we present an ionic liquid-based DNA extraction method (IL-DEx) that enables recovery of bacterial DNA from urine samples in under 30 minutes using minimal equipment and no hazardous chemicals. IL-DEx was benchmarked against a widely used commercial kit (QIAamp DNA Mini Kit, QIAGEN) using reference strains, clinical isolates, and spiked urine samples. For gram-negative bacteria, IL-DEx achieved comparable DNA yields (47–102% relative efficiency), while recoveries from gram-positive bacteria were lower (0.7–8%) but sufficient for downstream detection. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) revealed linear DNA recovery across five to six orders of magnitude (10–10^2; CFU/ml, R^2; >0.99), with detection limits of ~10^2;–10^3; CFU/ml for gram-negatives and ~10^3;–10^4; CFU/ml for gram-positives using 1 ml urine. Clinical evaluation with 13 patient urine samples (ten culture-positive, three culture-negative) demonstrated that IL-DEx reliably enabled pathogen detection by qPCR and full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Oxford Nanopore). Performance was comparable to three other extraction methods tested head-to-head, including the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN), the MagaZorb DNA Mini-Prep Kit (Promega), and a phenol-chloroform extraction method. These findings establish IL-DEx as the first ionic liquid-based approach evaluated for DNA recovery from clinical urine samples, providing a fast, simple, and low-cost method suitable for integration into molecular workflows for UTI diagnostics across diverse laboratory and clinical settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kreuter et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: