PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 2025International Journal of Consumer Studies5 citationsOpen Access

From Voice to Choice: Understanding the Consumer Response to Voice Assistant and Human Recommendations

View Full Paper
SRSimoni F. RohdenLELélis Balestrin EspartelJLJ. A. M. Lopes

Key Points

  • Human recommendations significantly increase purchase intention compared to voice assistants, underlining the importance of interaction quality.
  • The study involved 614 participants using two scenario-based experimental approaches to examine consumer perceptions and behaviors.
  • Perceived credibility and warmth are primary factors influencing consumer responses, with humans rated higher on these metrics.
  • The effect of recommendation type is moderated by individuals' need for cognition, impacting their critical evaluation of voice assistant recommendations.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Information technologies, particularly voice assistants (VAs), have transformed consumer interactions by enabling voice‐activated tasks and product recommendations. However, existing research has not fully explained the mechanisms underlying consumer responses to VA versus human‐generated recommendations. This research addresses this gap by investigating whether VAs influence consumer intentions differently from human salespeople. Using a randomized between‐subjects experimental design, we conducted two single‐factor scenario‐based studies ( n = 614), in which participants received a recommendation either from a salesperson or a VA. Results reveal that although consumers report greater willingness to use VAs in the future, recommendations from human salespeople more strongly influence both the intention to follow the recommendation and to purchase the product. Perceived credibility and warmth emerged as key explanatory mechanisms, with human salespeople rated higher on both dimensions. Moreover, we find that need for cognition moderates these effects: individuals high in need for cognition respond more critically to VA recommendations than those low in need for cognition. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how consumer perceptions and individual traits shape responses to AI versus human interactions, while offering actionable insights for improving VA design to increase warmth and credibility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rohden et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e03501f0e39f13e7fa38fbhttps://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70128
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers2000 · 3,904 citations
  2. 2An intertwined perspective on technology and digitised individuals: Linkages, needs and outcomes2020 · 17 citations
  3. 3Recommendation quality, transparency, and website quality for trust-building in recommendation agents2016 · 180 citations
  4. 4When You Feel You Own AI Assistants: How Consumer Ownership Enhances Consumers' Adoption Intention2025 · 9 citations
  5. 5Artificial intelligence or human: when and why consumers prefer AI recommendations2023 · 82 citations