Observational analysis reveals low specificity of microscopy for diagnosing chronic lymphocytic leukemia, highlighting flow cytometry's role.
Background Early and accurate identification of chronic lymphoproliferative diseases (CLPD) is crucial for guiding patient management. While microscopic evaluation remains a widely used screening tool, its diagnostic accuracy compared to flow cytometry is not well established. This study aimed to assess the reliability of microscopy-based criteria in diagnosing chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and other lymphoproliferative disorders, using flow cytometry as the reference method . Methods Our laboratory processes between 10,000 and 15,000 white blood cell (WBC) count samples daily using the Mindray BC-6800 Plus hematology analyzer. Over one year, we identified 758 patients whose initial findings met specific criteria suggestive of CLL, including age >50 years, WBC >10,000 cells/µL, platelet abnormalities, and the presence of Gumprecht bodies. Among these, 253 cases were confirmed as lymphoproliferative diseases. Flow cytometry was performed on a subset of these patients for diagnostic confirmation. Results Among the 758 patients initially suspected of having chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) based on microscopic evaluation, 253 were confirmed with a lymphoproliferative disorder through flow cytometry. Of these, 201 were diagnosed with CLL, while 20 were classified as normal/reactive, 18 had inconclusive results, and 14 were diagnosed with other lymphoproliferative disorders (T-cell, Mantle Cell, Plasma Cell). Statistical analysis revealed that the initial microscopy-based assessment demonstrated a sensitivity of 79.4% for detecting CLL. However, its specificity was low at 3.8%, indicating a high rate of false positives. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 28.5%, while the negative predictive value (NPV) was 27.8%. Overall, the concordance rate between microscopic evaluation and flow cytometry was 29.2%. Conclusion This study reinforces the critical role of flow cytometry in diagnosing lymphoproliferative disorders, as it led to a revised diagnosis in at least 20% of cases. The 92% correlation between Mindray BC-6800 Plus results and flow cytometry highlights its potential as a reliable screening tool. These findings highlight the importance of flow cytometry as a confirmatory tool, as it led to a revised diagnosis in at least 20% of cases. Additionally, the Mindray BC-6800 demonstrated a 92% correlation with flow cytometry, underscoring its potential as an initial screening tool for lymphoproliferative disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Filho et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: