PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 2025Frontiers in Food Science and Technology6 citationsOpen Access

A hybrid scoping and systematic review of food safety and quality control in selected low- and middle-income countries: challenges, policies, and effective interventions in Africa, Asia, and Latin America

View Full Paper
GDGodana Arero DassieWGWorku Dhugassa GirshaSBSultan Kalu Beggi

Key Points

  • A systematic review revealed Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points reduced foodborne diseases by 35%.
  • Weak hygiene control and poor food safety inspections were observed in 60% of reviewed studies.
  • Strong regulatory enforcement increased adherence rates over twofold, demonstrating its critical role in food safety.
  • Access to clean water and sanitation facilities significantly improved food safety practices across regions.

Abstract

Background Food safety is a main community wellbeing concern in developing regions, top to elevated load of food borne illness. Feeble application, execution, obliviousness, and unawareness, and deprived hygiene worsen contagion hazard. In spite of presented intercessions, their efficiency remnants contradictory, reflecting a serious study gap. The objective was to assess vital food safety defy and assess the efficacy of intercessions in developing regions. Methods A scoping review identified major food safety challenges and policies using peer-reviewed and grey literature from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. A systematic review assessed intervention effectiveness using PRISMA guidelines. A total of 3,500 articles were screened, with 220 meeting the inclusion criteria. Findings included contamination rates and regulatory enforcement levels. Logical outcomes incorporated interferences efficiency with adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals for a variety factors. Findings A scoping review showed numerous significant variables determining food safety results. Almost partly of the incorporated investigations (45%) verified pathogen infestation, within unofficial marketplace. Whereas 60% showed feeble food safety inspection, and hygiene control. Lack of consumers understanding was as well well-known in 50% of survey. Systematic review outcomes revealed that the performance of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points considerably rreduced food borne diseases by 35% (AOR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.55–0.85). Foodborne illness prevention training was connected with a 40% amplify in falling in line (AOR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1–1.7). Access to clean water (AOR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.3–2.2) and availability of proper sanitation facilities (AOR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2–2.0) were both significantly linked to improved food safety practices. Furthermore, government regulatory enforcement emerged as a strong determinant of compliance, with enforcement increasing adherence rates more than twofold (AOR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5–2.6). Conclusion and Recommendation Hazard Analysis, Critical Control Points, Low- and Middle-Income Countries; Public Health; Regulatory Enforcement; Contamination; Hygiene, training programs, and strong regulatory enforcement significantly enhance food safety. Policy harmonization and infrastructure development are essential for sustainable improvements.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dassie et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e040eda99c246f578b34e2https://doi.org/10.3389/frfst.2025.1570588
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper