This assessment reveals memory function differences in kidney transplant recipients and donors, suggesting implications for cognitive health monitoring.
Impaired memory function is a frequent yet understudied symptom in kidney transplant recipients. Here, we demonstrate a remote, minimally burdensome memory screener, the Seattle-Groningen Memory Assessment (SGMA), which estimates a patient's speed of forgetting from paired-associate learning. We show that the memory score derived from an 8-minute session is a reliable and accurate measure of an individual's ability for long-term retention. Kidney transplant recipients (n=556) showed more forgetting than (potential) donors (n=408). Memory scores were sensitive to demographics (age and education level), and related to self-reported sleep quality, fatigue, and health-related quality of life. On the physiological level, we were able to link more forgetting in recipients to more monocytes, neutrophils, reticulocytes, and a higher white blood cell count, as well as lower ferritin and more iron deficiency. Overall, this work highlights the potential of computational memory assessment as a minimally burdensome and reliable tool for detecting cognitive impairments in complex multimorbidity populations. The approach may be particularly valuable in research settings where detecting subtle changes in cognitive health, often missed by existing assessments, is crucial for understanding disease progression and treatment effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilschut et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: