Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals the challenges of the investigating judge's role in pre-trial investigations during military aggression, highlighting legislative changes.
The article retrospectively examines the theoretical, legislative and law enforcement issues related to ensuring by an investigating judge of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of a person and a citizen during pre-trial investigation, with due regard to the amendments and additions made by the legislator to his/her powers related to the military aggression against Ukraine, which determines his/her activities in the post-war perspective. Based on the above, it is noted that some of the powers of the investigating judge are temporarily vested in the prosecutor for the period of wartime and are delegated to the prosecutor in case of impossibility to exercise certain powers of the investigating judge in cases clearly defined by law. The scientific positions of scientists and representatives of national scientific schools were studied on these problematic issues, and the scientific positions on current and promising problematic issues were formed. Based on the results of the study, it was provided suggestions and recommendations on theoretical, organisational, procedural, legislative and other problematic issues and ways of their solution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ЖУРАВЕЛЬ et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: