Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis connects indexed oxygen delivery with systemic inflammatory response in patients, suggesting clinical implications for recovery.
Objectives Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is a common complication following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), associated with increased mortality. We assessed the relationship between indexed oxygen delivery (DO2i) during CPB and SIRS. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study at two institutions. The primary endpoint was clinically-defined SIRS 12 hours after surgery. The secondary endpoint was a composite outcome comprising death, TIA/stroke, renal replacement therapy, bleeding, mechanical circulatory support, or ICU stay >96 hours. The primary analysis modeled DO2i in multivariable logistic regression. Linearity was assessed with restricted cubic splines, knot-sensitivity, quintiles, and piecewise fits. The optimal ROC-derived threshold was explored. Patients above and below the threshold were matched 1:1 by propensity score. Structural equation modeling (SEM) assessed mediation between DO2i, SIRS, and outcomes. Results Of 1,154 patients screened, 908 were analyzed; 221 (24.3%) developed SIRS. Median DO2i was lower in the SIRS group (274 vs 302 mL/min/m2, p < 0.001). DO2i was inversely associated with SIRS (aOR 0.798; 95% CI 0.750-0.850, p < 0.001, per +10 mL/min/m2). In the secondary analysis, DO2i ≤ 293 mL/min/m2 was identified as threshold (sensitivity 62%, specificity 74%). Propensity score matched 390 patient pairs, with higher SIRS incidence in the low-DO2i group (33.3% vs 14.4%; p < 0.001). The composite outcome occurred more frequently in the low-DO2i cohort (17.7% vs 8.2%; p < 0.001). SEM showed mediation by SIRS, accounting for 46.2% of the DO2i effect on outcomes (OR 1.052; 95%CI 1.036-1.067; p < 0.001). Conclusion Low DO2i during CPB predicts SIRS and adverse outcomes. Goal-directed perfusion to reduce inflammation warrants evaluation in randomized trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Squiccimarro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: