ABSTRACT Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) may enable improved functional outcomes compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This randomized controlled trial assessed pre‐ and postoperative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and knee joint gait biomechanics for UKA and TKA patients. Patients were allocated to UKA (Oxford Partial Knee, Biomet, USA) and TKA (Persona CR Knee System, Zimmer, USA) study arms. Patients completed the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Western Ontario WOMAC sub‐scores; Patient‐specific correlations and root mean squared errors (RMSE) of stance phase sagittal and coronal knee angles. Statistical analysis included linear mixed‐effects models (PROMs; α = 0.0125) and multivariate analysis of variance (gait biomechanics; α = 0.05). A total of 38 patients were recruited (UKA n = 17; TKA n = 21). All PROMs improved significantly following surgery ( n = 37, p < 0.001), regardless of surgical technique. A significant effect of surgical technique on gait biomechanics was observed ( n = 30, F 4,25 , p = 0.010), where UKA patients displayed greater sagittal plane correlations median(Q1,Q3) UKA 0.985 (0.967, 0.991), TKA 0.955 (0.942, 0.973); p = 0.018] and lower coronal plane RMSEs UKA 3.6 (2.4,5.0)°, TKA 8.6 (5.1, 11.5)°; p = 0.002. Although patient‐reported outcomes improved similarly following UKA and TKA, UKA more closely preserved native knee kinematics as indicated by the greater similarity of sagittal gait patterns shapes and lower magnitude of coronal angle changes. Clinical Significance Greater preservation of patient‐specific knee kinematics with UKA supports its use in appropriately selected patients and informs the design of targeted, functionally oriented rehabilitation protocols.
Kuntze et al. (2025) studied this question.