Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitative analysis reveals the role of perceived risk and value in shaping preferences for Air–HSR transfer services.
As an indispensable component of the modern high‐quality national comprehensive three‐dimensional transport network, air and high‐speed rail intermodal transportation (Air–HSR) plays a pivotal role in advancing “transportation integration.” The transfer process in Air–HSR represents a critical touchpoint of service experience, and the investigation into passengers’ preferences for transfer service attributes is instrumental in providing civil aviation enterprises with a more personalized foundation for product development. First, six resource‐matching attributes of Air–HSR are extracted by introducing the resource‐matching theory (RMT) and drawing on the consumer behavior analytical methods. Subsequently, incorporating the perceived risk theory (PRT) and perceived value theory (PVT), a quantitative framework for passengers’ preferences for service attributes of Air–HSR transfer (RPP‐F) is proposed from the dual perspectives of perceived risk (PR) and perceived value (PV). Then, an analysis model (PR–PV–SEM) is constructed with PR and PV as mediating latent variables to examine passengers’ preferences for service attributes of Air–HSR transfer, and the preferences are analyzed through the lens of latent variables. Finally, based on measurement data of passengers’ diverse preferences, passengers’ heterogeneous preferences are analyzed and interpreted through the lenses of latent variables and socioeconomic attributes via multisampling approaches, and the internal preference structures of different attribute groups are deeply explored. The model results demonstrate that the PR–PV–SEM with PR and PV as mediating latent variables exhibits excellent model fit with its explanatory power for passengers’ adoption intention reaching 73%. This finding reveals the mediating mechanism between objective services and subjective willingness via PR and PV and provides a novel perspective for subsequent analysis of travel service preferences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: