Study demonstrates improved optoelectronic properties from lithium doping in solar cells, suggesting effective use with transparent back electrodes.
Crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar cells have nearly reached their theoretical efficiency limits, constrained by the intrinsic properties of silicon. To overcome these limitations, tandem solar cell devices combining a narrow-bandgap c-Si bottom cell with a wide-bandgap top cell have emerged as a promising approach. Ge-based kesterite materials (Cu2ZnGe(SS)e4), offer significant potential for this application due to their tunable optoelectronic properties, earth-abundant composition, and compatibility with cost-effective fabrication techniques. However, improving the structural and electronic properties of Ge-kesterite absorbers remains critical for advancing their performance. Lithium (Li) doping, previously successful in Sn-based kesterite materials (Cu2ZnSnSSe4), provides an approach to enhance crystallinity, defect passivation, and grain growth in Ge-kesterite materials. This study investigates the effect of lithium doping on the structural, morphological, and optoelectronic properties of Cu2ZnGe(SS)e4 (CZGSe) absorbers prepared using sputtered metallic precursors. Lithium was introduced via a Lithium fluoride (LiF) nano-layer, with an optimal thickness of 10 nm significantly improving absorber quality. Doped CZGSe solar cells achieved an efficiency of 6.4% on Mo substrates, demonstrating enhanced crystallinity, grain growth, and Voc compared to undoped samples. Applying this doping strategy to transparent back electrodes showed notable material improvements, but slightly lower efficiency compared to Mo-based cells. These findings underscore the potential of lithium as a promising alkali dopant for Ge-kesterite materials, paving the way for their integration into tandem and next-generation photovoltaic devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Er-rafyg et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: