Robotic ureteral reconstruction for endometriosis-induced strictures: insights from a multi-institutional experience

Abstract Purpose To investigate outcomes of robotic ureteral reconstruction (RUR) in female patients with ureteral strictures caused by peri-ureteral endometriosis lesions. Methods We retrospectively reviewed our multi-institutional Collaborative of Reconstructive Robotic Ureteral Surgery (CORRUS) database to identify all consecutive patients undergoing RUR for surgical management of endometriosis-induced ureteral strictures between 2017 and 2022. Indications for surgery included female patients with radiographic evidence of ureteral strictures and/or decreasing renal function on renal scan. We performed a descriptives analysis of perioperative outcomes in patients who met inclusion criteria. Surgical success was defined as freedom from additional interventions for recurrent ureteral stenosis. Results Overall, 19 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 39 (IQR 30–43) years. Ureteral strictures were located in the middle ureter in 4 (21.1%) patients and in the distal ureter in 15 (78.9%) patients. Fourteen (73.6%) patients had a known preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis. RUR techniques included refluxing reimplantation (47.4%), side-to-side reimplantation (21.1%), ureteroureterostomy (21.1%), and buccal mucosa graft ureteroplasty (10.5%). There was one (5.3%) major postoperative complication (Clavien > 2) in which a patient developed an intrabdominal abscess requiring drainage by interventional radiology. Five (26.3%) patients were ultimately diagnosed postoperatively with endometriosis based on surgical pathology. At a median follow-up of 22.5 (IQR 11.7–41.5) months, 18 (94.7%) patients were surgically successful. Conclusion Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for endometriosis in premenopausal women with ureteral stricture disease. RUR techniques may be effective for the management of patients with ureteral strictures secondary to endometriosis.