PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 7, 2025International Journal of Psychophysiology2 citationsOpen Access

The sensitivity of physiological measures to changes in mental workload

View Full Paper
ABAdrian BüchliSTStefan J. Troche

Key Points

  • Pupil dilation and blink rate are highly sensitive to changes in mental workload, enhancing assessment accuracy.
  • Increase in mental workload led to significant response time delays and decreased task accuracy in students.
  • The method used involved an adaptation of the Swaps task to induce varying levels of mental workload effectively.
  • Future research should focus on integrating physiological responses to improve machine-operator interactions.

Abstract

Mental Workload (MWL) quantifies the subjectively experienced mental strain imposed by any task and poses interesting avenues in machine or system optimization. Thus, the physiological measurement of MWL has been of large interest, but despite multiple decades of research, sensitivity to changes in MWL remains inconclusive (Ayres et al., 2021; Charles Tao et al., 2019). This study therefore re-evaluates sensitivity of six physiological measures to changes in MWL, namely in their ability to distinguish levels of MWL. With increasing MWL, heart rate (HR), blink rate (BR), pupil dilation (PD), skin conductance responses (SCR), and skin conductance level (SCL) were expected to increase, whereas heart rate variability (HRV) was expected to decrease. For MWL induction, an adaptation of the Swaps task (Stankov & Crawford, 1993) was employed, with the aim of inducing four distinct levels of demand. MWL manipulation was successful, as in the sample of 74 university students, response times significantly increased with each level, while accuracy decreased. Subjective ratings of MWL in the NASA-Task Load Index (Hart & Staveland, 1988) reflected this pattern. BR and PD were highly sensitive, increasing with each level, while HR and HRV were sensitive but less able to differentiate fine-grained changes, with the inability being more pronounced for HRV. SCR were sufficiently sensitive, except for very high levels, and SCL showed no sensitivity. These findings provide further basis for research and application of physiological responses to MWL, to represent task demands more comprehensively, as well as mental strain in machine-operator relations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Büchli et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e4ef18d9ba39bb23447ae2https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.113262
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper