Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study the impact of borrower protection on mortgage and housing demand using variation in the likelihood that houses are repossessed coming from heterogeneity in preferences of local judges. We develop a framework that provides conditions to identify the impact of repossession risk on housing and credit demand, holding supply fixed. Empirically, we exploit exogenous variation in risk created by boundaries of court catchment areas. We find that a one-standard-deviation decrease in borrower protection decreases borrowing and house prices by 4.5%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montebruno et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: