Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Let k be a perfect field. Assume that the characteristic of k satisfies certain tameness assumptions {tameness}. Let Oₙ := k z₁, …, zₙ and set Kₙ := Fract~ₙ. Let G be an almost-simple, simply-connected affine Chevalley group scheme with a maximal torus T and a Borel subgroup B. Given a n-tuple f = (f₁, …, fₙ) of concave functions on the root system of G as in Bruhat-Tits {bruhattits1}, {bruhattits}, we define { n-bounded subgroups P_f⊂ G(Kₙ)} as a direct generalization of Bruhat-Tits groups for the case $n=1$. We show that these groups are { schematic}, i.e. they are valued points of smooth { quasi-affine} (resp. { affine}) group schemes with connected fibres and { adapted to the divisor with normal crossing z₁ ⋯ zₙ =0} in the sense that the restriction to the generic point of the divisor zᵢ=0 is given by fᵢ (resp. sums of concave functions given by points of the apartment). This provides a higher-dimensional analogue of the Bruhat-Tits group schemes with natural specialization properties. In {mixedstuff}, under suitable assumptions on k {charassum}, we extend all these results for a $n+1$-tuple f = (f₀, …, fₙ) of concave functions on the root system of G replacing Oₙ by x₁,⋯,xₙ where is a complete discrete valuation ring with a perfect residue field k of characteristic p. In the last part of the paper, we give applications in char zero to constructing certain natural group schemes on wonderful embeddings of groups and also certain families of { 2-parahoric} group schemes on minimal resolutions of surface singularities that arose in {balaproc}.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balaji et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: