Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There is considerable variation in research explaining household solar-panel investment, leading to mixed evidence regarding influences of income and capital. We provide analysis aiding interpretation of economic influences on solar-panel uptake in other studies. We conduct a meta-regression using 234 papers to provide analytical insights focusing on economic influences on solar-panel investment. We find that the research approach and context explain a range of income influences. More specifically, studies using household-level data are less likely to find negative income impacts compared to studies using aggregate data. Developing-country studies have been less likely to include income; but when income is included, developing-country studies have been more likely to find a significant link from income to solar-panel uptake. Capital (e.g., asset) impacts are nearly always positive and significant when included, but only 22 percent of analyzed studies included a relevant variable. Our concluding policy discussion suggests greater focus on assets for means testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Best et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: