INTRODUCTION: The physical inactivity, hypoventilation, as well as chronic inflammation in obese patients aggravates their condition in various diseases. These features have become important with the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, in which inflammation and platelet-activated coagulopathy are closely linked. AIM: To study laboratory parameters of inflammation and platelet apoptosis in obese patients using various types of anticoagulant prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic complications with the underlying COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 370 patients with COVID-19. Depending on the presence or absence of obesity and the type of parenteral anticoagulant, patients in our study were divided into groups: group 1 — non-obese + low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (n = 114), group 2 — non-obese + unfractionated heparin (UFH) (n = 58), group 3 — obesity + LMWH (n = 76), group 4 — obesity + UFH (n = 66). The incidence of venous thromboembolic complications (VTEC), bleeding, general markers of the acute phase of inflammation, and specific markers of platelet apoptosis (phosphatidylserine and calreticulin) have been analyzed. RESULTS: At the end of hospital treatment, a decrease in ferritin levels was noted in patients both with and without obesity receiving LMWH. The concentration of calreticulin was higher in patients taking LMWH (groups 1 and 3). Phosphatidylserine levels were high in patients receiving LMWH only if they were obese. In patients taking UFH compared to LMWH, a high incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) without a source (13.6% of cases versus 2.6%, respectively, p = 0.029) and PE with a source in the lower extremities (9.1% of cases versus 0%, respectively, p = 0.018) was found. When using LMWH, a lower incidence of bleeding was observed compared to using UFH (5.3% of cases versus 16.7%, respectively, p = 0.056). CONCLUSION: The levels of phosphatidylserine and calreticulin are higher in obese patients receiving LMWH. At the same time, patients in this group have a low incidence of VTEC and hemorrhagic complications compared to the group of patients taking UFH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agapov et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: