Background : Endogenous analgesic systems in the brain modulate pain perception. Offset analgesia (OA) describes the large decrease in perceived pain in response to a minor decrease in applied painful thermal stimulus. Here non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) of the cerebellum is used to probe OA. Methods : An OA protocol individualized to heat pain threshold (HPT) was applied via TSA-II (Medoc, Israel). Heat was ramped to HPT, with a transient temperature increase of HPT+1°C. NIBS interventions were applied prior to OA in 46 participants within a sham controlled repeated measures design. Cathodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and high-definition (4X1) transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) were applied in separate experimental sessions to examine whether diffuse (tDCS) or focal (HD-tDCS) stimulation differentially modulates OA. Results : OA induced hypoanalgesia was robust, with 90% of responses showing a substantial drop in perceived pain (δVAS) following the 1°C fall in temperature, with an average VAS decrease of 38 in response to the 1°C fall in temperature. Cathodal cerebellar HD-tDCS enhances the analgesic impact of OA on four OA parameters (OA latency, VAS minimum, VAS mean and VAS 2nd max) relative to pre-stimulation. Conventional tDCS modulates two OA metrics relative to pre-stimulation (OA duration, VAS 2nd max) with an increase in OA duration following sham tDCS. Conclusion : There is a differential influence of conventional and high-definition cerebellar NIBS on OA. This is suggestive of cerebellar modulation of OA and highlights the importance of electrode montage in delineating the influence of the cerebellum in pain processing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’CONNOR et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: