This essay sets aside George Eliot's preoccupation with incarnation, a principle extrapolated from the New Testament, and instead identifies in her work a parallel discourse of reincarnation: the reentry into flesh, the successive rebirth and reembodiment of a preexisting spiritual entity in new forms. Drawing on Victorian understandings of Buddhism and Hinduism, I trace Eliot's interest in forms of ensouled embodiment that take shape in multiple iterations over time. Inspired by calls to reimagine the geographical and chronological boundaries of Victorian studies, I additionally pair Middlemarch (1871–72) with Qurratulain Hyder's River of Fire (English trans. 1998), a twentieth-century Urdu novel which makes reincarnation a central narrative principle. In doing so, I examine how both authors employ a reincarnational aesthetic to theorize the place of the individual in history and even the nature of history itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maha Jafri (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: