Objective: This noninvasive study aimed to understand the interaction between shield-triggered autoinjectors (AI) and skin at the point of activation, hypothesizing that the AI’s housing absorbs a significant amount of the user-applied force depending on shield design and skin characteristics. Methods: Twenty-seven volunteers used a test device measuring applied force versus shield force and indentation depth relative to shield length (2,4,6,8 mm) in standing and sitting positions. Results: Significant differences were found between applied and shield force for the different shield lengths. Shorter shields resulted in significantly lower force transfer coefficients, with means ranging from 0.72 for the 2 mm shield to 0.94 for the 8 mm shield. ANOVA revealed statistically significant factors (p < .05), including position and gender, with females generally having lower coefficient values. Indentation depth increased with higher forces and varied significantly between positions without significant shield length impact. Conclusion: The findings confirm that an increase in shield length at the point of activation reduces skin friction with the housing, resulting in less force loss and a lower device activation force perceived by the user. Force loss can be further reduced by standing up. Understanding device-tissue interactions will support development of better AIs with fewer user failures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Staples et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: