Following Hill and Leblond, the aim of our work is to show, for isotropic nonlinear elasticity, a relation between the corotational Zaremba-Jaumann objective derivative of the Cauchy stress σ, i.e. {equation} {{ D}ZJ}{{ D} t}[σ] = {{ d}}{{ d}{t}}[σ] - W \, σ + σ \, W, W = { skew}( F \, F⁻¹) {equation} and a constitutive requirement involving the logarithmic strain tensor. Given the deformation tensor F = D φ, the left Cauchy-Green tensor B = F \, FT, and the strain-rate tensor D = sym( F \, F⁻¹), we show that {equation} {eqCPSdef} {alignedat}{2} ∀ \,D∈{ Sym}(3) \! \! \{0\}: ~ {{{ D}ZJ}{{ D} t}[σ]},{D} > 0 & log B σ(log B) \;is strongly Hilbert-monotone & { sym} { D}log B σ(log B) ∈{ Sym}⁺⁺_4(6) (TSTS-M⁺⁺), {alignedat} {1} {equation} where Sym⁺⁺₄(6) denotes the set of positive definite, (minor and major) symmetric fourth order tensors. We call the first inequality ``corotational stability postulate'' (CSP), a novel concept, which implies the True-Stress True-Strain strict Hilbert-Monotonicity (TSTS-M⁺) for B ↦ σ(B) = σ(log B), i.e. {equation} σ(log B_1)-σ(log B_2),{log B_1-log B_2} > 0 ∀ \, B_1≠ B_2∈{ Sym}⁺⁺(3) \, . {equation} In this paper we expand on the ideas of Hill and Leblond, extending Leblonds calculus to the Cauchy elastic case.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
d’Agostino et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: